Skip to content
BuyOnceRight: buy once, buy right
Juicers · Head-to-head

Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer vs NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200

Both made our Best Juicers for Small Kitchens shortlist, at #1 and #2. Here's how they differ and who each one suits.

Quick verdict

Choose the Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer if you want vertical stacking design uses far less counter length than a horizontal masticating juicer. Choose the NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200 if you'd rather have fewest parts to disassemble, making it the fastest to put away in a cabinet after use. Overall we rank the Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer higher: #1 versus #2 in our Best Juicers for Small Kitchens list.

Winner overall: Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer

Side by side

Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer vs NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200 compared

Every difference that matters, in one table.

Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer versus NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200
Attribute
Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer product photo
Hurom H-AA Slow JuicerCheck price
NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200 product photo
NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200Check price
Our ranking#1 of 3 in Best Juicers for Small Kitchens#2 of 3 in Best Juicers for Small Kitchens
Pick label
BrandHuromNutriBullet
Key featuresSingle auger, upright design; 150W quiet motor; Adjustable pulp control lever1000W high-torque motor; 27oz sealing juice pitcher; 3-inch feed chute with dual-size pusher
Biggest strengthVertical stacking design uses far less counter length than a horizontal masticating juicerFewest parts to disassemble, making it the fastest to put away in a cabinet after use
Main trade-offHighest price of the group, a real consideration for a smaller secondary applianceWide feed chute needs more clearance to operate than the Hurom's chamber
Best forsmall kitchenssmall kitchens
Decide

Which should you buy?

Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer

#1 pick

Choose the Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer if…

  • Vertical stacking design uses far less counter length than a horizontal masticating juicer
  • Quiet motor is a real advantage in a small apartment kitchen with shared walls
  • High juice yield despite the compact body, no performance tradeoff for the smaller footprint

Best for: small kitchens

Prefer the alternative? See the NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200 section.

NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200

#2 pick

Choose the NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200 if…

  • Fewest parts to disassemble, making it the fastest to put away in a cabinet after use
  • Sealing pitcher doubles as fridge storage, useful when counter space is limited
  • Lower price makes it a reasonable secondary appliance in a small kitchen

Best for: small kitchens

Prefer the alternative? See the Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer section.

The trade-offs

Pros and cons of each

Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer

Pros

  • Vertical stacking design uses far less counter length than a horizontal masticating juicer
  • Quiet motor is a real advantage in a small apartment kitchen with shared walls
  • High juice yield despite the compact body, no performance tradeoff for the smaller footprint

Cons

  • Highest price of the group, a real consideration for a smaller secondary appliance
  • Narrower feed chamber than wide-chute centrifugal juicers means more pre-cutting
  • More parts to store separately if it doesn't live permanently on the counter

NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200

Pros

  • Fewest parts to disassemble, making it the fastest to put away in a cabinet after use
  • Sealing pitcher doubles as fridge storage, useful when counter space is limited
  • Lower price makes it a reasonable secondary appliance in a small kitchen

Cons

  • Wide feed chute needs more clearance to operate than the Hurom's chamber
  • Centrifugal motor housing is bulkier than an equivalent masticating auger body
  • Lower yield than masticating options, meaning more storage-and-retrieval cycles for the same amount of juice
Answers

Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer vs NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200: common questions

Which is better, the Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer or the NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200?

Choose the Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer if you want vertical stacking design uses far less counter length than a horizontal masticating juicer. Choose the NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200 if you'd rather have fewest parts to disassemble, making it the fastest to put away in a cabinet after use. Overall we rank the Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer higher: #1 versus #2 in our Best Juicers for Small Kitchens list.

What is the difference between the Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer and the NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200?

The Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer stands out because vertical stacking design uses far less counter length than a horizontal masticating juicer, while the NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200 stands out because fewest parts to disassemble, making it the fastest to put away in a cabinet after use. The trade-offs differ too: the Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer's main caveat is that highest price of the group, a real consideration for a smaller secondary appliance, and the NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200's is that wide feed chute needs more clearance to operate than the Hurom's chamber.

Is the Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer worth it over the NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200?

For most buyers, yes: it's our #1 pick. Consider the NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200 instead if highest price of the group, a real consideration for a smaller secondary appliance is a deal-breaker for you.

Who should buy the NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200 instead of the Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer?

The NutriBullet Juicer Pro NBJ50200 suits small kitchens, while the Hurom H-AA Slow Juicer is best for small kitchens.

Keep researching